A Myth Beyond the Phallus: Female Fetishism in Kathy Acker’s Late Novels

A Myth Beyond the Phallus: Female Fetishism in Kathy Acker’s Late Novels

1 Debates about feminine fetishism have now been going on for pretty much 2 full decades now; but there seems to be up to now no opinion concerning the worth of claiming this specific training for feminist politics.

Ever since Sarah Kofman’s recommendation that a reading that is derridean of 1927 essay could maybe perhaps maybe not preclude the possibility of feminine fetishism (133), “indecidability” has characterized nearly all try to theorize that training. Naomi Schor’s very early suspicion that feminine fetishism could be just the “latest and a lot of delicate type of penis envy” (371) will continue to haunt efforts to delimit a particularly feminine manifestation of the perversion commonly recognized, in psychoanalytic terms, become reserved for males. Subsequent efforts to “feminize” the fetish by Elizabeth Grosz, Emily Apter, and Teresa de Lauretis have reiterated Schor’s hesitation in regards to the subject, and none have actually dispelled entirely the shadow of this doubt that is inaugural. Proponents of feminine fetishism may actually have held Baudrillard’s warning that is famous fetish discourse, as well as its capability to “turn against people who utilize it” (90), firmly at heart. Read more